Topics in Dental Materials
Back to Impression Materials

Elastic Materials

From the DentTest dentistry textbook, with 45 practice questions. Last updated 6 August 2026.

Definition: Elastic impression materials can be removed from undercuts without permanent distortion (if handled correctly), so they are suitable for dentate, partially dentate, and edentulous patients. They fall into hydrocolloids (agar = reversible, alginate = irreversible) and synthetic elastomers (polysulphide, polyether, silicones), with elastomers generally offering the best surface detail and dimensional stability for fixed prosthodontics, provided moisture control and technique are appropriate.


Hydrocolloids vs Synthetic Elastomers

Feature

Hydrocolloids

Synthetic Elastomers

Main types

Agar (reversible), Alginate (irreversible)

Polysulphide, Polyether, Condensation silicone, Addition silicone

“Sol–gel” mechanism

Agar: physical gel ⇄ sol ⇄ gel via heating/cooling (reversible)  \nAlginate:chemical cross-linking sol → gel(irreversible)

Chemical cross-linking of polymer chains into a 3-D network (liquid → rubber)

Hydrophilicity / wetting

Generally hydrophilic (adapt readily to moist tissues)

Generally hydrophobic → moisture contamination can cause loss of detail (polyether wets best; silicones most problematic unless “hydrophilic” versions with surfactant)

Surface detail

Agar: very good detail  \nAlginate: lower detail (not recommended for crown/bridge)

Excellent detail when low-viscosity (wash) materials are used; often exceeds what gypsum can reproduce

Dimensional stability on storage

Poorer: prone to syneresis (water loss → shrinkage) and imbibition (water uptake → distortion); typically pour ASAP / within ~1 hour

Better overall: 

  • Addition-cured silicone and polyether → very stable 

  • Condensation silicone shrinks over time (alcohol by-product

  • Polysulphide can shrink on storage (water by-product)

Tray requirements (typical)

Often stock trays; agar uses special water-cooled trays + water bath

Often special trays (esp. polysulphide/polyether); silicones support many techniques incl. putty/wash in stock trays

Tear strength

Alginate has low tear strength (tears easily in undercuts)

Highest in polysulphide, then polyether, then silicones(adequate, but technique matters)

Permanent deformation (viscoelasticity)

Viscoelastic → snap removal needed; alginate permanent deformation can be clinically relevant

Also viscoelastic → snap removal still important; silicones show least permanent set, polysulphides more viscous flow

Handling/setting consistency

Agar requires equipment and temperature control; alginate is simple, cheap, time-controlled

Polysulphide and condensation silicone can be more variable with environment/mixing; polyether and addition silicone are more consistent; addition silicone may be inhibited by latex gloves

Typical indications

Alginate: study models, prelim impressions, many denture impressions  \nAgar: now uncommon (equipment/cross-infection issues)

Fixed prosthodontics: crowns/bridges/inlays; situations needing high accuracy and stability; duplicate dies (addition silicone)

This preview stops here. The full topic continues with a free account.